Wednesday

Taking Advantage of the Athlete$

In the most recent issue of Time Magazine, Texas A&M football star Johnny Manziel appeared on the cover, which you can view here.  But, if he wants to sell autographed copies of the cover to his biggest fans, the NCAA will not allow it.  Why?

Manziel makes "money-making" hand gesture during A&M's season opener
This debate has gone on for decades, and was brought to national attention when University of Michigan's "Fab Five" made it to the Final Four in 1991.  During the season, stores across Michigan and the country were selling t-shirts with the players' names and faces on it, yet the players were not receiving a dime.  This theme has continued to grow and spin out of control as colleges nationwide makes millions of dollars off the work of their students, and the only money these students can receive is scholarship money.

This summer, the NCAA investigated allegations that Manziel was paid to sign autographs on multiple occasions, which is a clear violation of the NCAA's rules.  After a long investigation, the NCAA did not find a lot of evidence, therefore Manziel was only suspended for the first half of their first game against Rice.  But the pressing question is why Johnny Manziel and college athletes across nation aren't allowed to make money off of their own celebrity status.  Most of the athletes in college will never play professionally, so this is probably the most valuable they will ever be in their lives.  For instance, Manziel won the Heisman Trophy last season as college football's best player, yet  he still does not project to be a successful NFL quarterback.  He may spend four or five years in the league, and then could become employed.  So imagine how athletes with no possibility of any professional sports career feel when they are putting in over 50 hours a week for their team, but their success only results in millions for the universities, and nothing for themselves.

I believe that college athletes should be able to make money off of their own "celebrity", but should not be paid by colleges to play for their school.  For example, athletes should be able to receive money for autographs, endorsements, television appearances, apparel sales, and such.  This makes perfect sense because the money is not coming from the universities, and the players are making money off of their names, not the universities' names.  Obviously, I do not think that players should be paid for playing from colleges because then it would become a bidding war for the best high school players, and the whole college sports scene would be tarnished.

So I say let Manziel and the others capitalize on a time in their lives where they will never be more valuable, and the NCAA should do this sooner rather than later.

What do you think about college athletes being paid?  Do you think the universities should be able to pay them?  Should they be able to make money off of their celebrity?  Or do you think the rules should remain the same, and athletes should receive no money?







4 comments:

  1. I have never really realized the thought that they could be paid for off the field instances. It seems so much more logical that way and then the NCAA wouldnt have to get involved. On the other hand, Alabama made over $32 million on its football program alone last year so it doesnt seem right for a certain team of 100 players to be able to draw in such a high amount of money with out evening seeing one cent.

    ReplyDelete
  2. i agree Dave, my POV on this subject is that Johnny Manziel or any college star athlete has the same right to money as any enrolled student in college. A student has many opportunities to obtain a job and be successful, weather its simple or a very sophisticated job. If these students can make money by being good at their jobs or doing something right, why can't an athlete like Manziel? I look at popularity in a job or sport, is equivalent to being successful, so if you are popular or establish success, why not receive money?

    ReplyDelete
  3. You're spot on big guy. Although I don't think that college players should be getting endorsements, I do believe that they should be able to capitalize off of their status as a collegiate athlete rather than give away their fame to the general public. If some talentless hack is going to sell a Manziel autographed helmet for thousands of dollars in the future than how is it fair at all that he doesn't get anything for that? The NCAA needs to adapt to the road that sports entertainment is going, and why not start here...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm actually going to have to disagree with you David. I see where you are coming from when you say that players should be able to use their fame to make money for themselves, however I feel that the downside to this whole use of "fame" would hurt players more than it would benefit them. When you bring up a player like Manziel playing maybe four to five years then going unemployed, I don't see how being able to sell autographs in college would help his unemployment cause. What players really should be doing is focusing on their education during college, which leads in to a whole new topic of should players have to stay all four years in college? However, I do completely agree with you that if colleges were to pay players to play college football, the league would be corrupt, and high budget schools would ultimately take over the game.

    ReplyDelete